AI video model comparison

Veo 2 vs Grok 2025

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Veo 2 is the better overall choice over Grok 2025. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Veo 2
Grok 2025

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Veo 2 is the better choice

Veo 2 scores higher than Grok 2025 in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in actor performance, but Grok 2025 costs less.

Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 2

56.0Overall score
Rank
#8
Price per minute
$21.00/min
xAI

xAI

Grok 2025

54.0Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$4.20/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Veo 2

Veo 2 leads the overall score by 2.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 2

Veo 2 leads by 17.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 runs $4.20/min, against $21/min for Veo 2.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 generates audio with the video; Veo 2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

165
videos rated
4,663
measurements
660
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Veo 2 wins 8 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap2D Animation: Grok 2025 ahead by 49.5 points.
Closest categoryPrompt Adherence: Veo 2 ahead by 3.5 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

Veo 2Grok 2025
Physics
56.2
45.9
Prompt Adherence
58.0
54.5
Logic Consistency
38.3
43.3
Scene Consistency
57.7
66.9
Cinematography
67.7
52.7
2D Animation
23.0
72.5
3D Animation
54.5
67.7
Anime Animation
27.3
39.5
Human
52.7
57.9
Hands
59.9
39.7
Actor Performance
65.3
34.7
Objects
57.8
53.1
Animals
75.8
54.5
Text Fidelity
54.0
37.0

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Veo 2
122 videos rated · Jul 2026
Grok 2025
43 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Veo 2Grok 2025

Veo 2's biggest lead: Motion stability, 52.0 versus 35.0.

Grok 2025's biggest lead: Freeze-free playback, 100.0% versus 91.0%.

Technical cleanliness
64.0%
60.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
91.0%
100.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
96.0%
95.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
52.0
35.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
69.0
55.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 17.0 points.

Show the full prompt

Times Square at night: massive LED billboards display rotating ads. COCA-COLA, SAMSUNG, BROADWAY SHOWS.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Grok 2025
Veo 2
Grok 2025

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 10.3 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Grok 2025
Veo 2
Grok 2025

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 15.0 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Grok 2025
Veo 2
Grok 2025

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityVeo 2Grok 2025
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoYes
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Veo 2 better than Grok 2025?

Veo 2 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Veo 2 cheaper than Grok 2025?

Grok 2025 costs less at $4.20 per minute, compared with $21 for Veo 2.

Does Veo 2 generate audio?

No, Veo 2 does not include audio output.

Does Grok 2025 generate audio?

Yes, Grok 2025 includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Veo 2 or Grok 2025?

Grok 2025 supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 8 seconds for Veo 2.

Which model scores higher on 2D Animation, Veo 2 or Grok 2025?

Grok 2025 scores higher for 2D animation.

Which model scores higher on Actor Performance, Veo 2 or Grok 2025?

Veo 2 scores higher for actor performance.

How are Veo 2 and Grok 2025 compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 2ByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 2KlingGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Grok 2025ByteDancexai73.0 / 54.0
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 2KlingGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Veo 3 vs Veo 2GoogleGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Grok 2025Klingxai62.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 2xaiGoogle58.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Grok 2025Klingxai60.0 / 54.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle56.0 / 56.0
Veo 3 vs Grok 2025Googlexai60.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Grok 2025xaixai58.0 / 54.0
Veo 2 vs PixVerse v5.5GooglePixVerse56.0 / 55.0
Veo 3.1 vs Grok 2025Googlexai56.0 / 54.0
Veo 2 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance56.0 / 53.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Grok 2025PixVersexai55.0 / 54.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Sora 2 ProGoogleOpenAI56.0 / 50.0
Grok 2025 vs Seedance 1.5 ProxaiByteDance54.0 / 53.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 48.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Vidu Q2GoogleVidu56.0 / 45.0
Grok 2025 vs Sora 2 ProxaiOpenAI54.0 / 50.0
Veo 2 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks56.0 / 43.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 48.0
Veo 2 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 40.0
Grok 2025 vs Vidu Q2xaiVidu54.0 / 45.0
Veo 2 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika56.0 / 26.0
Grok 2025 vs LTX-2 19BxaiLightricks54.0 / 43.0
Veo 2 vs Infinity StarGoogleFoundationVision56.0 / 24.0
Grok 2025 vs Gen-4.5xaiRunway54.0 / 40.0
Grok 2025 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoxaiPika54.0 / 26.0
Grok 2025 vs Infinity StarxaiFoundationVision54.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Veo 2 and Grok 2025

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 165 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.