Legacy evaluation · V1

PixVerse v5.5 vs Grok 2025

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

PixVerse v5.5 is the better overall choice over Grok 2025. It has the higher overall score and costs less.

Share
PixVerse v5.5
Grok 2025
Our verdict

PixVerse v5.5 is the better choice

PixVerse v5.5 has a higher overall score than Grok 2025. Its biggest lead is in text rendering, and it also costs less.

PixVerse

PixVerse

PixVerse v5.5

55.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$0.60/min
xAI

xAI

Grok 2025

54.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$4.20/min

Best for

Highest overall score

PixVerse v5.5

PixVerse v5.5 leads the overall score by 1.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

PixVerse v5.5

PixVerse v5.5 leads by 25.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

PixVerse v5.5

PixVerse v5.5 runs $0.60/min, against $4.20/min for Grok 2025.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 generates audio with the video; PixVerse v5.5 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

88
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

PixVerse v5.5 wins 6 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap2D Animation: Grok 2025 ahead by 37.2 points.
Closest categoryLogic Consistency: PixVerse v5.5 ahead by 0.3 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

PixVerse v5.5Grok 2025
Physics
45.5
45.9
Prompt Adherence
53.5
54.5
Logic Consistency
43.6
43.3
Scene Consistency
64.6
66.9
Cinematography
60.8
52.7
2D Animation
35.3
72.5
3D Animation
62.7
67.7
Human
63.6
57.9
Actor Performance
49.7
34.7
Objects
48.2
53.1
Animals
61.4
54.5
Text Fidelity
62.0
37.0

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

PixVerse v5.5 leads here by 25.0 points.

Matched Text outputs from PixVerse v5.5 and Grok 2025
Loading video
PixVerse v5.5
Loading video
Grok 2025

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Grok 2025 leads here by 0.4 points.

Matched Physics outputs from PixVerse v5.5 and Grok 2025
Loading video
PixVerse v5.5
Loading video
Grok 2025

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

PixVerse v5.5 leads here by 8.1 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from PixVerse v5.5 and Grok 2025
Loading video
PixVerse v5.5
Loading video
Grok 2025

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityPixVerse v5.5Grok 2025
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoYes
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is PixVerse v5.5 better than Grok 2025?

PixVerse v5.5 is better overall and leads the broader mix of quality categories.

Is PixVerse v5.5 cheaper than Grok 2025?

PixVerse v5.5 costs less at $3 per minute, compared with $4.20 for Grok 2025.

Does PixVerse v5.5 generate audio?

No, PixVerse v5.5 does not include audio output.

Does Grok 2025 generate audio?

Yes, Grok 2025 includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, PixVerse v5.5 or Grok 2025?

Grok 2025 supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 10 seconds for PixVerse v5.5.

Which model scores higher on 2D Animation, PixVerse v5.5 or Grok 2025?

Grok 2025 scores higher for 2D animation.

Which model scores higher on Text Fidelity, PixVerse v5.5 or Grok 2025?

PixVerse v5.5 scores higher for text rendering.

How are PixVerse v5.5 and Grok 2025 compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested PixVerse v5.5 and Grok 2025

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.