Swipe for more top models
Compare
Grok vs Veo 3 Fast
Grok 2025 edges out Veo 3 Fast overall (Grok 2025 54.0 vs Veo 3 Fast 48.0.) Grok 2025 is a very respectable entry and for its model generation is probably one of the best for rapid iteration given the cost. Especially with a subscription, Grok allows you to generate a ton and is extremely competent. If you're looking for a cheap daily runner, this would be it. The main tradeoffs are in Deprecated model, where Veo 3 Fast tends to score better.
Grok 2025xai | Veo 3 FastGoogle |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
xai
xAI
xai is the platform that serves Grok 2025 requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Grok 2025 leads on physics (+3.9), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+3.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.9 | 42.0 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Grok 2025 leads on prompt and logic (+8.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Scene Consistency (+16.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 54.5 | 48.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 43.3 | 40.7 |
| Scene Consistency | 66.9 | 50.0 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Grok 2025 leads on aesthetics (+2.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+4.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 52.7 | 48.7 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Grok 2025 leads on animation (+15.9), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+34.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 72.5 | 37.7 |
| 3D Animation | 67.7 | 51.3 |
| Anime Animation | 39.5 | 43.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3 Fast leads on humans (+7.4), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+22.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 57.9 | 53.2 |
| Hands | 39.7 | 44.7 |
| Actor Performance | 34.7 | 56.7 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Grok 2025 leads on objects and animals (+3.8), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+8.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 53.1 | 53.9 |
| Animals | 54.5 | 46.0 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3 Fast leads on text (+8.0), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+8.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 37.0 | 45.0 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Grok 2025 leads on cost and speed (+199.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+595.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.050 | $0.100 |
| Price / min | $3.00 | $6.00 |
| Latency | 0ms | 595ms |