Swipe for more top models
Compare
Grok vs Veo 3
Veo 3 edges out Grok 2025 overall (Grok 2025 54.0 vs Veo 3 60.0.) Veo 3 is an incredible model that proves Google is leading the pack in cinematic generations. It's great for cinematography and has built-in audio capability. It can struggle with logical worldbuilding on more creative camera requests, but most of the time it does quite well. Where it takes a step back: actor performances weren't as good as Veo 2, and the output has a glossier look. Veo 2 had more cinematic taste. Image-to-video tasks also struggle more than prior models. The main tradeoffs are in Actor performances, Logical worldbuilding, Has a glossy aesthetic, Image-to-video tasks, where Grok 2025 tends to score better.
Grok 2025xai | Veo 3Google |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
xai
xAI
xai is the platform that serves Grok 2025 requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Veo 3 leads on physics (+12.3), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Physics (+12.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.9 | 58.2 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Veo 3 leads on prompt and logic (+4.4), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+9.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 54.5 | 54.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 43.3 | 53.2 |
| Scene Consistency | 66.9 | 70.7 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Veo 3 leads on aesthetics (+1.6), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+3.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 52.7 | 55.9 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Grok 2025 leads on animation (+4.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+19.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 72.5 | 53.0 |
| 3D Animation | 67.7 | 64.0 |
| Anime Animation | 39.5 | 49.7 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3 leads on humans (+5.8), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Hands (+10.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 57.9 | 54.7 |
| Hands | 39.7 | 50.0 |
| Actor Performance | 34.7 | 45.0 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 3 leads on objects and animals (+11.7), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Objects (+14.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 53.1 | 67.6 |
| Animals | 54.5 | 63.3 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3 leads on text (+5.7), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+5.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 37.0 | 42.7 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Grok 2025 leads on cost and speed (+286.4), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3. The clearest separation is on Latency (+850.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.050 | $0.200 |
| Price / min | $3.00 | $12.00 |
| Latency | 0ms | 850ms |