Swipe for more top models
Compare
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Seedance 2.0
Seedance 2.0 edges out Veo 3.1 Fast overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs Seedance 2.0 73.0.) Seedance 2.0 is an incredible model that can produce extremely consistent scenes with incredible actor performances. It can produce complex cinematic scenes in one go. Important caveat: this model produces the most copyrighted content out of any model we've tested—if copyright compliance is important, avoid this one. The main tradeoffs are in Logical inconsistencies in details, Copyright compliance (produces the most copyrighted content of any model), where Veo 3.1 Fast tends to score better.
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | Seedance 2.0ByteDance |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
ByteDance
bytedance
ByteDance is the platform that serves Seedance 2.0 requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Seedance 2.0 leads on physics (+17.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+17.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.7 | 63.4 |
Prompt Comparisons
Physics
Prompt
Camera above water, 3/4 portrait of a young person floating in a body of water, her entire body submerged except for her face, a glassy surface with cushioned headphones on, eyes serenely closed, her face haloed by cornflowers and chrysanthemums floating on the surface slowly orbiting in the current. Bubbles trace lazy arcs upward, dappled light fracturing across her freckled skin. Deep cobalt and violet palette, no struggle, only the unhurried weightlessness of complete calm.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Physics
Prompt
High-end skincare commercial macro, slow push-in on a cream-colored cosmetic tube laid diagonally on a glass surface flooded with fresh white foam and pooling water, its black label reading "Lumae Calming Cleanser" standing crisp and unblurred as suds churn around it. Bubbles rise, water beads slide along the tube, gentle daylight rakes across the glossy plastic. Each character of the typeface remains intact and proportionate throughout, glassy clinical-meets-natural styling.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Physics
Prompt
Stylized art-direction motion piece, locked frontal medium shot on a classical marble bust set against a saturated cinnabar-red backdrop, a a flame, burning the bust as the stone remains undamaged beneath the kinetic light. Hard side key light carving each curl in shadow, gentle smoke-like haze rising past the frame, the elegant intensity of an icon held under theatrical illumination.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Seedance 2.0 leads on prompt and logic (+34.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Prompt Adherence (+34.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 44.0 | 78.6 |
| Logic Consistency | 41.5 | 75.9 |
| Scene Consistency | 50.7 | — |
Prompt Comparisons
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Anime walking-shot in the style of a quiet contemporary anime film, low POV camera tracking forward over a dirt road, framing a person's worn sneakers and beige cargo pants stepping in steady rhythm. Ahead, a small valley town spills downhill under a blazing orange sunset streaked with telephone lines and clouds. Painterly clouds with rim-lit edges, hand-drawn dust puffs at each step, the kind of contemplative end-of-day walk that doesn't need narration.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Surrealist cinematic locked wide, foreground a single small white rabbit sitting perfectly still in a hayfield, ears twitching as a tall white farmhouse behind it is engulfed in large flames. Tiny paper flecks drift, the rabbit ignores them, grass swaying in the warm draft. Saturated 35mm film grade, painterly composition, impossible calm.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Anime cinematic shot, low-angle hero composition of a young mage in a slate cloak standing center-frame as luminous white energy ribbons spiral up from the moss around his feet and weave through the canopy of a primeval forest. Eyes closed, hands clasped in concentration, robe lifting subtly. Sun shafts piercing the trees, painterly Shinkai sky peeking through, ribbons animating in fluid 2D ink-and-light strokes, the held silence of summoned focus.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Seedance 2.0 leads on aesthetics (+10.8), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+21.1). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 74.5 |
| Taste | — | 40.0 |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.9 |
Prompt Comparisons
Cinematography
Prompt
70s Kodachrome-grain motion picture footage, telephoto compression tracking shot of an adult runner in saffron shorts moving through chest-high wheat alongside a long-haired white farm dog, both bounding in syncopated leaps. Cobalt cloudless sky, golden stalks lit from behind, a hint of overexposure flaring the highlights. Slight gate weave, soft anamorphic flares.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Cinematography
Prompt
High-contrast black-and-white aerial, locked overhead shot of a boxing ring with one figure seated low in shadow at the bottom of frame as two opponents circle each other slowly in the bright square below, long shadows pinwheeling. The crowd is invisible blackness beyond the ropes. Single hard top-down light pool, crushed blacks, soft 35mm grain, the choreographed stillness of a Wong Kar-wai standoff.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Physics
Prompt
Hyper-slow-motion macro at 4000fps, frontal close-up of an icy lime cocktail glass as a cascade of crystalline water erupts upward through the rim, droplets suspended in mid-air like glass beads, condensation streaking the sides. Tropical bokeh of turquoise sea and palm fronds dissolves behind. Razor-sharp focus on the splash crown, golden rim of late-afternoon sun, the kind of frozen-time food-commercial moment that lasts a full beat too long.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Seedance 2.0 leads on animation (+34.9), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+50.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 27.7 | 70.8 |
| 3D Animation | 15.0 | 65.6 |
| Anime Animation | 54.3 | 65.3 |
Prompt Comparisons
2D Animation
Prompt
Clean 2D hand-painted cartoon animation, locked close framing on a small blue paper kite hanging near an open window in a pastel teal room. A gentle indoor breeze lifts the string, the kite tilts left, then rights itself with soft squash-and-stretch timing. Chalky textures, simple painted shadows, warm afternoon light, one clear beat of quiet wonder.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized CG short, slow push-in on a young ceremonial leader in turquoise and gold ceremonial headwear staring directly down the lens, identical companions in perfect symmetrical formation receding behind her into a sunlit colonnade. Her jaw sets, eyes narrow, and a single geometric earring sways. Hyper-clean feature-animation shader work, soft skin shading, dust motes hanging in shafts of light, the second before a coordinated step forward, no dialogue, just held breath.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized 3D animated sequence, slow tracking shot following a hefty woolly bovine sauntering down a narrow aisle of an antique porcelain boutique, glass shelves crammed with delicate vases on either side. Each heavy footstep makes the floorboards tremble, lamps swaying, a single vase teetering and almost falling. Warm amber gallery lighting, plush carpet underfoot, the held-breath tension of inevitable collision, animated with deliberate weight and timing.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Seedance 2.0 leads on humans (+13.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Human (+22.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 55.3 | 77.5 |
| Hands | 77.3 | 81.2 |
| Actor Performance | 56.3 | — |
Prompt Comparisons
Human
Prompt
High-fashion editorial motion shot, locked symmetrical frame of a model in a tailored mint flight-attendant uniform leaning against a stack of matching pastel suitcases, fingertips delicately raised, lips painted carmine, eyes tracking imperceptibly toward camera. Background a single saturated mint-green wall. Mid-century travel-poster styling, slow micro-movements, polished commercial lighting, the cool poise of an entire era distilled into one held pose. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Hands
Prompt
Cinematic medium two-shot on a misty fantasy training field, a tired knight in dented plate kneeling as a hooded healer in pale linen gently lays her palm over his dusty vambrace, a faint warm glow pulsing beneath her fingers. Embers from a nearby campfire drift between them, distant figures rendered out of focus. Soft golden magic-hour light pierces the haze, painterly anamorphic frame, the held tension between relief and unfinished duty.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Hands
Prompt
Extreme fisheye action-camera lens locked on a studio stunt performer in a white tee barreling through a skyline flying towards camera, hands thrust forward and splayed wide right up against the camera, fingers individually articulated, palm lines and ring catching refracted light.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Seedance 2.0 leads on objects and animals (+13.9), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+20.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.6 | 64.6 |
| Animals | 55.1 | 76.0 |
Prompt Comparisons
Objects
Prompt
Editorial fashion commercial shot, slow vertical crane move rising from base level up to eye-level on a deep oxblood-red leather handbag perched on a circular white plinth, gold padlock and tassel swaying delicately as a curtain of cream silk drapery behind it ripples in a gentle off-screen breeze. Warm tungsten film grade, narrow shaft of light caressing the leather grain, museum-like reverence, the quiet drama of a single object held under a single beam.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Objects
Prompt
Graphic-design product shot, locked symmetrical frame of a tall clear glass bottle with vibrant magenta-and-yellow label split exactly between a deep teal and a hot-pink color block backdrop, a single palm leaf casting an animated soft shadow as it sways off-camera. Hard direct sun shifts subtly, gradient highlights tracing the curvature. Memphis-meets-minimalism styling, saturated to the edge of acid, the bottle held like a sculpture under tropical noon. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Objects
Prompt
Luxury commercial product shot, slow 360-degree turntable on a square olive-glass bottle with a brushed amber cap, a single silk ribbon and small ivory label fluttering as the platform rotates. Long soft shadow stretches across the warm beige seamless. Polished beauty lighting, micro-reflections traveling along the glass edges, dust motes catching in a single hair-light, hushed minimalist counter-display elegance, 8K macro precision.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Seedance 2.0 leads on text (+28.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+28.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 47.7 | 75.9 |
Prompt Comparisons
Anime Animation
Prompt
Cinematic hand-painted anime sequence, wide aerial shot of a young traveler in dark robes standing on the back of a long iridescent serpent dragon as it weaves through a rose-gold dawn sky over rust-red dunes, scales rippling like opal under the sun. The dragon banks gently as its eye glints toward camera. Painterly clouds, soft volumetric backlight, hair and sash whipping in slow wind, the awe of first flight.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Anime Animation
Prompt
Soft slice-of-life anime moment, low-angle medium close-up of two college-aged friends resting in tall grass, one with auburn hair leaning into frame as the breeze moves a loose strand across the other friend’s cheek. He blinks up and smiles quietly. Warm afternoon sun filters through a green canopy, lens flare wisps, painted bokeh of distant hills, the suspended hush of a tender unspoken moment.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Objects
Prompt
Stylized still-life commercial shot, locked-off on a cream 1980s CRT television set against a sage backdrop, its screen alive with a hand-painted urban garden of vines, miniature towers, and tiny solar panels that subtly animate inside the screen as if the world within is breathing. The plastic housing reflects a faint warm key light, dust hanging in the air. Conceptual museum-piece styling, slight CRT scanline shimmer, the gentle whir of a vacuum tube barely audible.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Seedance 2.0 leads on cost and speed (+211.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+638.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Seedance 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.100 | $0.150 |
| Price / min | $6.00 | $9.00 |
| Latency | 638ms | 0ms |
Prompt Comparisons
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Fantasy CG short-film moment, medium close-up of a small wrinkled humanoid in a moss-green robe reaching with quiet reverence toward a floating violet crystal suspended in the boughs of a luminous tree of glass leaves. Fireflies drift between him and the orb, the foliage gently chiming as he extends an open palm. Nebular purple sky, bioluminescent ground flora, painterly volumetrics, the breath-held instant before contact.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Photoreal cinematic long take, slow forward dolly down a grand marble hall toward a fully armored knight standing dead center, sword tip resting on the floor, gauntleted hand lifting a glass of red wine in a small toast directly to camera. Crystal chandelier sways gently overhead, crimson cape pooling on polished stone. Anamorphic widescreen, deep aristocratic palette of marble cream and oxblood, the dry comedy of formal manners performed by a tin can.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Surrealist cinematic wide, locked symmetrical composition on a suited man in dusty taupe standing chest-deep in a sea of pale pink cosmos blooms, a plain brown cardboard box covering his head, briefcase loose in one hand. Wind stirs the flowers in synchronized waves around him while he stands completely motionless. Wes-Anderson-meets-Magritte palette of pastel pinks and turquoise sky, dry midday sun, the absurd serenity of a man who has stopped pretending he can see. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0