Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
#5
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V1

Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 Fast

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Seedance 2.0 is the better overall choice over Veo 3.1 Fast. It scores higher in every quality category shown.

Share
Seedance 2.0
Veo 3.1 Fast
Our verdict

Seedance 2.0 is the better choice

Seedance 2.0 scores higher than Veo 3.1 Fast in every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in 3D animation, and it also supports longer clips.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0

73.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$7.26/min
Google

Google

Veo 3.1 Fast

51.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$6.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads the overall score by 22.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads by 37.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1 Fast runs $6/min, against $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Provider prices can change.

73
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 2.0 wins all 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Seedance 2.0 ahead by 67.5 points.
Closest categoryObjects: Seedance 2.0 ahead by 5.6 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 2.0Veo 3.1 Fast
Physics
68.3
45.7
Prompt Adherence
76.3
44.0
Logic Consistency
61.0
41.5
Scene Consistency
73.4
50.7
Cinematography
84.1
53.4
2D Animation
69.7
27.7
3D Animation
82.5
15.0
Human
69.1
55.3
Actor Performance
86.0
56.3
Objects
63.3
57.6
Animals
78.0
55.1
Text Fidelity
85.0
47.7

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 37.3 points.

Matched Text outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 22.6 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 30.8 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3.1 Fast

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 2.0 detailsSee full Veo 3.1 Fast details
CapabilitySeedance 2.0Veo 3.1 Fast
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputYesNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 2.0 better than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Seedance 2.0 is better overall and scores higher in every quality category.

Is Seedance 2.0 cheaper than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 Fast costs less at $6 per minute, compared with $9.07 for Seedance 2.0.

Does Seedance 2.0 generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 2.0 includes audio output.

Does Veo 3.1 Fast generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 Fast includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Seedance 2.0 supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 8 seconds for Veo 3.1 Fast.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Seedance 2.0 scores higher for 3D animation.

Which model scores higher on 2D Animation, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Seedance 2.0 scores higher for 2D animation.

How are Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Fast compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

Continue researching

Seedance 2.0

Veo 3.1 Fast

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Fast

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.