Swipe for more top models
Compare
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Kling 3 Pro
Kling 3 Pro edges out Veo 3.1 Fast overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs Kling 3 Pro 62.0.) Kling 3 Pro is a clear upgrade from Kling 2.6 and the Veo 3.1 models on most dimensions. It excels at human performance and emotive acting, has some of the best prompt understanding of any model, and produces cinematic, well-composed shots with standout animal realism. It can very fluidly go from slow motion to regular speed, showing really good temporal coherence. It can generate some nonsensical outputs, so expect to run a few prompts to get it right. But when it gets it right, it's quite good. 2D animation and anime are average. Text rendering is just okay and may require some re-prompting. The main tradeoffs are in Expensive, Can generate nonsensical outputs, where Veo 3.1 Fast tends to score better.
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | Kling 3 ProKling |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 3 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Kling 3 Pro leads on physics (+13.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+13.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.7 | 59.3 |
Prompt Comparisons
Physics
Prompt
High-end skincare commercial macro, slow push-in on a cream-colored cosmetic tube laid diagonally on a glass surface flooded with fresh white foam and pooling water, its black label reading "Lumae Calming Cleanser" standing crisp and unblurred as suds churn around it. Bubbles rise, water beads slide along the tube, gentle daylight rakes across the glossy plastic. Each character of the typeface remains intact and proportionate throughout, glassy clinical-meets-natural styling.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Stylized art-direction motion piece, locked frontal medium shot on a classical marble bust set against a saturated cinnabar-red backdrop, a a flame, burning the bust as the stone remains undamaged beneath the kinetic light. Hard side key light carving each curl in shadow, gentle smoke-like haze rising past the frame, the elegant intensity of an icon held under theatrical illumination.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Hyper-slow-motion macro at 4000fps, frontal close-up of an icy lime cocktail glass as a cascade of crystalline water erupts upward through the rim, droplets suspended in mid-air like glass beads, condensation streaking the sides. Tropical bokeh of turquoise sea and palm fronds dissolves behind. Razor-sharp focus on the splash crown, golden rim of late-afternoon sun, the kind of frozen-time food-commercial moment that lasts a full beat too long.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Kling 3 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+16.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+20.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 44.0 | 63.5 |
| Logic Consistency | 41.5 | 61.6 |
| Scene Consistency | 50.7 | 61.0 |
Prompt Comparisons
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Anime walking-shot in the style of a quiet contemporary anime film, low POV camera tracking forward over a dirt road, framing a person's worn sneakers and beige cargo pants stepping in steady rhythm. Ahead, a small valley town spills downhill under a blazing orange sunset streaked with telephone lines and clouds. Painterly clouds with rim-lit edges, hand-drawn dust puffs at each step, the kind of contemplative end-of-day walk that doesn't need narration.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Anime cinematic shot, low-angle hero composition of a young mage in a slate cloak standing center-frame as luminous white energy ribbons spiral up from the moss around his feet and weave through the canopy of a primeval forest. Eyes closed, hands clasped in concentration, robe lifting subtly. Sun shafts piercing the trees, painterly Shinkai sky peeking through, ribbons animating in fluid 2D ink-and-light strokes, the held silence of summoned focus.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Fantasy CG short-film moment, medium close-up of a small wrinkled humanoid in a moss-green robe reaching with quiet reverence toward a floating violet crystal suspended in the boughs of a luminous tree of glass leaves. Fireflies drift between him and the orb, the foliage gently chiming as he extends an open palm. Nebular purple sky, bioluminescent ground flora, painterly volumetrics, the breath-held instant before contact.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Kling 3 Pro leads on aesthetics (+5.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+9.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 63.3 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.7 |
Prompt Comparisons
Cinematography
Prompt
Extreme wide-angle 16mm-style fisheye, locked-off on the bow of a tall ship as an adult sailor crouches near the camera, the bowsprit and rigging curving around him in distorted arcs, gray Atlantic swell heaving behind. Wind whips his curls, ropes thump against masts. Heavy practical grain, vignetted edges, desaturated blues and bone whites, archival expedition film texture.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cinematography
Prompt
Cinematic medium-wide tracking shot through a sunlit primeval forest, a robed rider sidesaddle on a pale long-maned steed picking its way slowly between mossy oaks, dust motes hanging in cathedral shafts of light. The animal exhales, mane lifting in a soft updraft, her gaze fixed gently forward. Lush emerald-and-amber grade, anamorphic compression, the unhurried pace of a fable, no soundtrack but birdsong and hooffalls on leaf litter. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cinematography
Prompt
70s Kodachrome-grain motion picture footage, telephoto compression tracking shot of an adult runner in saffron shorts moving through chest-high wheat alongside a long-haired white farm dog, both bounding in syncopated leaps. Cobalt cloudless sky, golden stalks lit from behind, a hint of overexposure flaring the highlights. Slight gate weave, soft anamorphic flares.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Kling 3 Pro leads on animation (+20.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+45.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 27.7 | 47.3 |
| 3D Animation | 15.0 | 60.0 |
| Anime Animation | 54.3 | 51.3 |
Prompt Comparisons
3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized 3D animated sequence, slow tracking shot following a hefty woolly bovine sauntering down a narrow aisle of an antique porcelain boutique, glass shelves crammed with delicate vases on either side. Each heavy footstep makes the floorboards tremble, lamps swaying, a single vase teetering and almost falling. Warm amber gallery lighting, plush carpet underfoot, the held-breath tension of inevitable collision, animated with deliberate weight and timing.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Original CG kitchen-comedy shot, medium frontal framing on a flustered purple many-armed alien chef in a starched white toque managing eight saucepans at once, extra arms darting between burners, ladles, and seasoning shakers. Steam rises in choreographed plumes, garnish flies in arcs, enormous yellow eyes darting between tasks. Stainless-steel kitchen behind, rim-lit by overhead heat lamps, lively comedic timing of a dinner rush at peak chaos.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Anime Animation
Prompt
Soft slice-of-life anime moment, low-angle medium close-up of two college-aged friends resting in tall grass, one with auburn hair leaning into frame as the breeze moves a loose strand across the other friend’s cheek. He blinks up and smiles quietly. Warm afternoon sun filters through a green canopy, lens flare wisps, painted bokeh of distant hills, the suspended hush of a tender unspoken moment.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Kling 3 Pro leads on humans (+8.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+24.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 55.3 | 75.9 |
| Hands | 77.3 | 57.8 |
| Actor Performance | 56.3 | 81.0 |
Prompt Comparisons
Hands
Prompt
Cinematic medium two-shot on a misty fantasy training field, a tired knight in dented plate kneeling as a hooded healer in pale linen gently lays her palm over his dusty vambrace, a faint warm glow pulsing beneath her fingers. Embers from a nearby campfire drift between them, distant figures rendered out of focus. Soft golden magic-hour light pierces the haze, painterly anamorphic frame, the held tension between relief and unfinished duty.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Hands
Prompt
Extreme fisheye action-camera lens locked on a studio stunt performer in a white tee barreling through a skyline flying towards camera, hands thrust forward and splayed wide right up against the camera, fingers individually articulated, palm lines and ring catching refracted light.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cinematography
Prompt
70s Kodachrome-grain motion picture footage, telephoto compression tracking shot of an adult runner in saffron shorts moving through chest-high wheat alongside a long-haired white farm dog, both bounding in syncopated leaps. Cobalt cloudless sky, golden stalks lit from behind, a hint of overexposure flaring the highlights. Slight gate weave, soft anamorphic flares, the unhurried freedom of a quiet Sunday afternoon.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Kling 3 Pro leads on objects and animals (+5.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+10.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.6 | 57.9 |
| Animals | 55.1 | 65.8 |
Prompt Comparisons
Objects
Prompt
Stylized still-life commercial shot, locked-off on a cream 1980s CRT television set against a sage backdrop, its screen alive with a hand-painted urban garden of vines, miniature towers, and tiny solar panels that subtly animate inside the screen as if the world within is breathing. The plastic housing reflects a faint warm key light, dust hanging in the air. Conceptual museum-piece styling, slight CRT scanline shimmer, the gentle whir of a vacuum tube barely audible.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cinematography
Prompt
High-contrast black-and-white aerial, locked overhead shot of a boxing ring with one figure seated low in shadow at the bottom of frame as two opponents circle each other slowly in the bright square below, long shadows pinwheeling. The crowd is invisible blackness beyond the ropes. Single hard top-down light pool, crushed blacks, soft 35mm grain, the choreographed stillness of a Wong Kar-wai standoff.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cinematography
Prompt
High-contrast black-and-white aerial, locked overhead shot of a boxing ring with one figure seated low in shadow at the bottom of frame as two opponents circle each other slowly in the bright square below, long shadows pinwheeling. The crowd is invisible blackness beyond the ropes. Single hard top-down light pool, crushed blacks, soft 35mm grain, the choreographed stillness of a Wong Kar-wai standoff.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Kling 3 Pro leads on text (+6.0), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+6.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 47.7 | 53.7 |
Prompt Comparisons
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Photoreal cinematic long take, slow forward dolly down a grand marble hall toward a fully armored knight standing dead center, sword tip resting on the floor, gauntleted hand lifting a glass of red wine in a small toast directly to camera. Crystal chandelier sways gently overhead, crimson cape pooling on polished stone. Anamorphic widescreen, deep aristocratic palette of marble cream and oxblood, the dry comedy of formal manners performed by a tin can.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Surrealist cinematic wide, locked symmetrical composition on a suited man in dusty taupe standing chest-deep in a sea of pale pink cosmos blooms, a plain brown cardboard box covering his head, briefcase loose in one hand. Wind stirs the flowers in synchronized waves around him while he stands completely motionless. Wes-Anderson-meets-Magritte palette of pastel pinks and turquoise sky, dry midday sun, the absurd serenity of a man who has stopped pretending he can see. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on cost and speed (+19788.7), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Latency (+59362.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.100 | $0.168 |
| Price / min | $6.00 | $10.08 |
| Latency | 638ms | 60.0s |