#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0 Pro
#2
KlingKling 3 Pro
#3
KlingKling 2.6
#3
GoogleVeo 3
#5
xaiGrok Imagine 1.0
Compare

Veo 3 vs Kling 3 Pro

Veo 3 and Kling 3 Pro are both top-tier video models with near-identical overall scores (60 vs 62). Veo 3 offers native audio and superior scene consistency, while Kling 3 Pro excels at human performances and prompt adherence. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize audio integration or actor realism.

Google
Google
Veo 3
60
60
Total Score
Veo 3
rank
#3
cost
12.00
/min
speed
850
ms
Kling
Kling
Kling 3 Pro
62
62
Total Score
Kling 3 Pro
rank
#2
cost
0.50
/min
speed
60.0
sec
Veo 3Google
Kling 3 ProKling
Good for
  • Objects and Animals
  • Animation
Good for
  • Humans
  • Text
  • Aesthetics
  • Prompt and Logic
Bad for
  • Humans
  • Text
  • Aesthetics
Bad for
  • Objects and Animals
  • Animation
Modalities
CapabilityVeo 3Kling 3 Pro
Text input
Image input
Video input
Audio input
Image output
Audio output

Providers

Google
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 requests, pricing, and availability.
Kling
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 3 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.

Physics

Physics handling is essentially tied, with Veo 3 at 58.2 and Kling 3 Pro at 59.3. Both models deliver reliable physical simulations without a meaningful difference in quality.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Prompt and Logic

Kling 3 Pro leads in prompt adherence (63.5 vs 54) and logic consistency (61.6 vs 53.2), showing stronger understanding of complex instructions. Veo 3 can struggle with logical worldbuilding on creative camera requests.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Aesthetics

Kling 3 Pro scores higher on cinematography (63.3 vs 55.9) and overall quality (78.6% vs 67.5%). Veo 3 tends toward a glossier aesthetic, while Kling 3 Pro produces more cinematic, well-composed shots.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Taste
Prompt
A cinematic hummingbird hovering over vivid flowers at sunrise, 8s
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Animation

Veo 3 edges ahead in 2D animation (53 vs 47.3) and 3D animation (64 vs 60), while anime results are nearly identical. Both models deliver average-to-good animation performance overall.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-painted rotoscope: a ballerina performs fouettés, traced from live reference but stylized with ink outlines and watercolor fills. The motion is realistic but the look is distinctly illustrated.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-drawn puppy 2D cel-shaded animation style: a golden retriever pup with floppy ears chases a butterfly through a meadow, trips over its own paws, rolls, and bounds up joyfully. Watercolor backgrounds, expressive line work, heartwarming motion.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Humans

Kling 3 Pro dominates human rendering (75.9 vs 54.7) and actor performance (81 vs 45), with better hand accuracy (57.8 vs 50). This is the largest gap between the two models.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Human
Prompt
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Hands
Prompt
Close up of a wrinkled elderly woman's weathered hands carefully folding an origami crane. Paper creases with each deliberate fold, fingers moving with practiced precision. Soft warm lighting, intimate macro detail.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Objects and Animals

Veo 3 handles objects better (67.6 vs 57.9), while Kling 3 Pro has a slight edge on animals (65.8 vs 63.3). Choose based on whether your content features more inanimate objects or creatures.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Animals
Prompt
A wet dog shakes itself dry in glorious slow motion. Water droplets spiral off. Fur contorts into absurd shapes. Joy radiates from its face.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Objects
Prompt
Raindrops land on a leather jacket. The water beads, rolls off, darkens the leather where it lingers. The jacket's texture stays locked.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Text

Kling 3 Pro renders text more reliably (53.7 vs 42.7), though both models produce only moderate text fidelity. Expect some re-prompting for accurate text with either model.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Text Fidelity
Prompt
Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Times Square at night: massive LED billboards display rotating ads. COCA-COLA, SAMSUNG, BROADWAY SHOWS.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Cost and Speed

Veo 3 offers native audio generation and image-to-video input, though I2V tasks can struggle. Kling 3 Pro may require multiple attempts due to occasional nonsensical outputs, and pricing data is unavailable for direct cost comparison.
MetricVeo 3Kling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
CGI animated kitten discovers snow: a fluffy orange tabby steps onto fresh powder for the first time, paw sinking in. Startled shake, curious sniff, then gleeful pouncing. Fur dynamics, subsurface scattering on ears, irresistible charm.
Veo 3
vs
Kling 3 Pro