Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
#5
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V1

Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Seedance 2.0 is the clear winner over Veo 3. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown and costs less.

Share
Add as preferred source
Seedance 2.0
Veo 3
Our verdict

Seedance 2.0 is the clear winner

Seedance 2.0 scores higher than Veo 3 in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in text rendering, and it also costs less.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0

73.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$7.26/min
Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 3

60.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$24.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads the overall score by 13.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads by 42.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 runs $7.26/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.

Provider prices can change.

122
videos rated
3,538
measurements
488
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 2.0 wins 11 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Seedance 2.0 ahead by 42.3 points.
Closest categoryScene Consistency: Seedance 2.0 ahead by 2.7 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 2.0Veo 3
Physics
68.3
58.2
Prompt Adherence
76.3
54.0
Logic Consistency
61.0
53.2
Scene Consistency
73.4
70.7
Cinematography
84.1
55.9
2D Animation
69.7
53.0
3D Animation
82.5
64.0
Human
69.1
54.7
Actor Performance
86.0
45.0
Objects
63.3
67.6
Animals
78.0
63.3
Text Fidelity
85.0
42.7

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Seedance 2.0
No reliability results available
Veo 3
122 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Seedance 2.0Veo 3
Technical cleanliness
Not published
57.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
Not published
93.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
Not published
83.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
Not published
70.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
Not published
80.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 42.3 points.

Matched Text outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 10.1 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 leads here by 28.3 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3
Loading video
Seedance 2.0
Loading video
Veo 3

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 2.0 detailsSee full Veo 3 details
CapabilitySeedance 2.0Veo 3
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesNo
Audio inputYesNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 2.0 better than Veo 3?

Seedance 2.0 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Seedance 2.0 cheaper than Veo 3?

Seedance 2.0 costs less at $9.07 per minute, compared with $24 for Veo 3.

Does Seedance 2.0 generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 2.0 includes audio output.

Does Veo 3 generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3 includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3?

Seedance 2.0 supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 8 seconds for Veo 3.

Which model scores higher on Text Fidelity, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3?

Seedance 2.0 scores higher for text rendering.

Which model scores higher on Actor Performance, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3?

Seedance 2.0 scores higher for actor performance.

How are Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3 compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

Continue researching

Seedance 2.0

Veo 3

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 122 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.