Swipe for more top models
Compare
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Veo 3 Fast
Seedance 1.5 Pro edges out Veo 3 Fast overall (Seedance 1.5 Pro 53.0 vs Veo 3 Fast 48.0.) Seedance 1.5 Pro performs well on dialogue-led videos where lip-sync and camera movement quality matter. It is a strong fit for talking-head narratives, multilingual spoken scenes, and cinematic promo cuts. It is less reliable for text-heavy compositions, crowded action choreography, and scenes requiring precise object-level interactions. The main tradeoffs are in Readable text overlays, Crowded action scenes, Precision object interactions, where Veo 3 Fast tends to score better.
Seedance 1.5 ProByteDance | Veo 3 FastGoogle |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
ByteDance
bytedance
ByteDance is the platform that serves Seedance 1.5 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Veo 3 Fast leads on physics (+5.5), with a measurable advantage over Seedance 1.5 Pro. The clearest separation is on Physics (+5.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 36.6 | 42.0 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Seedance 1.5 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+14.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Scene Consistency (+26.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 1.5 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 67.3 | 48.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 38.7 | 40.7 |
| Scene Consistency | 76.2 | 50.0 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Seedance 1.5 Pro leads on aesthetics (+7.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+14.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 1.5 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 62.7 | 48.7 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Seedance 1.5 Pro leads on animation (+11.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+21.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 1.5 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 59.0 | 37.7 |
| 3D Animation | 69.0 | 51.3 |
| Anime Animation | 39.0 | 43.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Seedance 1.5 Pro leads on humans (+7.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+11.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 1.5 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 56.6 | 53.2 |
| Hands | 50.9 | 44.7 |
| Actor Performance | 68.3 | 56.7 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 3 Fast leads on objects and animals (+5.7), with a measurable advantage over Seedance 1.5 Pro. The clearest separation is on Objects (+15.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 38.4 | 53.9 |
| Animals | 50.1 | 46.0 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3 Fast leads on text (+40.0), with a measurable advantage over Seedance 1.5 Pro. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+40.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 5.0 | 45.0 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Seedance 1.5 Pro leads on cost and speed (+196.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+595.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 1.5 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Seedance 1.5 Pro | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.200 | $0.100 |
| Price / min | $12.00 | $6.00 |
| Latency | 0ms | 595ms |