Megaton
Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0 Fast
#3
AlibabaHappyHorse-1.0
#3
KlingKling 3 Pro
#5
GoogleVeo 3

Swipe for more top models

AI video model comparison

Seedance 1.5 Pro vs LTX-2 19B

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Seedance 1.5 Pro is the better overall choice over LTX-2 19B. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Seedance 1.5 Pro
LTX-2 19B

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Seedance 1.5 Pro is the better choice

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher than LTX-2 19B in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in 3D animation, and it also supports longer clips.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 1.5 Pro

53.0Overall score
Rank
#12
Price per minute
$3.12/min
Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX-2 19B

43.0Overall score
Rank
#17
Price per minute
$2.39/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 1.5 Pro

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads the overall score by 10.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

LTX-2 19B

LTX-2 19B leads by 14.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

LTX-2 19B

LTX-2 19B runs $2.39/min, against $3.12/min for Seedance 1.5 Pro.

Provider prices can change.

95
videos rated
2,708
measurements
380
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 1.5 Pro wins 10 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Seedance 1.5 Pro ahead by 40.7 points.
Closest categoryAnime Animation: Seedance 1.5 Pro ahead by 4.0 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 1.5 ProLTX-2 19B
Physics
36.6
41.9
Prompt Adherence
67.3
50.0
Logic Consistency
38.7
16.8
Scene Consistency
76.2
52.2
Cinematography
62.7
53.4
2D Animation
59.0
55.0
3D Animation
69.0
28.3
Anime Animation
39.0
35.0
Human
56.6
33.6
Hands
50.9
34.6
Actor Performance
68.3
54.3
Objects
38.4
47.6
Animals
50.1
54.6
Text Fidelity
5.0
19.3

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Seedance 1.5 Pro
47 videos rated · Jul 2026
LTX-2 19B
48 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Seedance 1.5 ProLTX-2 19B

Seedance 1.5 Pro's biggest lead: Clean framing, 98.0% versus 83.0%.

LTX-2 19B's biggest lead: Motion stability, 58.0 versus 0.0.

Technical cleanliness
45.0%
35.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
100.0%
98.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
98.0%
83.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
0.0
58.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
39.0
71.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

LTX-2 19B leads here by 14.3 points.

Show the full prompt

Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by Seedance 1.5 Pro and LTX-2 19B
Seedance 1.5 Pro
LTX-2 19B

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

LTX-2 19B leads here by 5.3 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Seedance 1.5 Pro and LTX-2 19B
Seedance 1.5 Pro
LTX-2 19B

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads here by 9.2 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Seedance 1.5 Pro and LTX-2 19B
Seedance 1.5 Pro
LTX-2 19B

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 1.5 Pro detailsSee full LTX-2 19B details
CapabilitySeedance 1.5 ProLTX-2 19B
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoYes
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 1.5 Pro better than LTX-2 19B?

Seedance 1.5 Pro is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Seedance 1.5 Pro cheaper than LTX-2 19B?

LTX-2 19B costs less at $2.39 per minute, compared with $3.12 for Seedance 1.5 Pro.

Does Seedance 1.5 Pro generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 1.5 Pro includes audio output.

Does LTX-2 19B generate audio?

Yes, LTX-2 19B includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Seedance 1.5 Pro or LTX-2 19B?

Seedance 1.5 Pro supports longer clips at 12 seconds, compared with 5 seconds for LTX-2 19B.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Seedance 1.5 Pro or LTX-2 19B?

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher for 3D animation.

Which model scores higher on Scene Consistency, Seedance 1.5 Pro or LTX-2 19B?

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher for scene consistency.

How are Seedance 1.5 Pro and LTX-2 19B compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 1.5 ProByteDanceByteDance73.0 / 53.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 1.5 ProKlingByteDance62.0 / 53.0
Kling 2.6 vs Seedance 1.5 ProKlingByteDance60.0 / 53.0
Veo 3 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance60.0 / 53.0
Seedance 2.0 vs LTX-2 19BByteDanceLightricks73.0 / 43.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Seedance 1.5 ProxaiByteDance58.0 / 53.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX-2 19BKlingLightricks62.0 / 43.0
Veo 2 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance56.0 / 53.0
Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance56.0 / 53.0
Kling 2.6 vs LTX-2 19BKlingLightricks60.0 / 43.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Seedance 1.5 ProPixVerseByteDance55.0 / 53.0
Veo 3 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks60.0 / 43.0
Grok 2025 vs Seedance 1.5 ProxaiByteDance54.0 / 53.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs LTX-2 19BxaiLightricks58.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastByteDanceGoogle53.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks56.0 / 43.0
Veo 3.1 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks56.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Sora 2 ProByteDanceOpenAI53.0 / 50.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs LTX-2 19BPixVerseLightricks55.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Veo 3 FastByteDanceGoogle53.0 / 48.0
Grok 2025 vs LTX-2 19BxaiLightricks54.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Vidu Q2ByteDanceVidu53.0 / 45.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Gen-4.5ByteDanceRunway53.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks51.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoByteDancePika53.0 / 26.0
Sora 2 Pro vs LTX-2 19BOpenAILightricks50.0 / 43.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Infinity StarByteDanceFoundationVision53.0 / 24.0
Veo 3 Fast vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks48.0 / 43.0
Vidu Q2 vs LTX-2 19BViduLightricks45.0 / 43.0
LTX-2 19B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway43.0 / 40.0
LTX-2 19B vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoLightricksPika43.0 / 26.0
LTX-2 19B vs Infinity StarLightricksFoundationVision43.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 1.5 Pro and LTX-2 19B

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 95 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
View the complete leaderboardCompare more outputs in the Arena