Legacy evaluation · V1

Kling 2.6 vs Infinity Star

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Kling 2.6 is the better overall choice over Infinity Star. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown.

Share
Kling 2.6
Infinity Star
Our verdict

Kling 2.6 is the better choice

Kling 2.6 scores higher than Infinity Star in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in 2D animation, and it also is the only model here with audio output.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 2.6

60.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$4.20/min
FoundationVision (ByteDance)

FoundationVision (ByteDance)

Infinity Star

24.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$0.84/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Kling 2.6

Kling 2.6 leads the overall score by 36.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Kling 2.6

Kling 2.6 leads by 20.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Infinity Star

Infinity Star runs $0.84/min, against $4.20/min for Kling 2.6.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Kling 2.6

Kling 2.6 generates audio with the video; Infinity Star does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

85
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Kling 2.6 wins all 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap2D Animation: Kling 2.6 ahead by 51.7 points.
Closest categoryPrompt Adherence: Kling 2.6 ahead by 12.8 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 2.6Infinity Star
Physics
59.5
14.5
Prompt Adherence
60.8
48.0
Logic Consistency
47.4
23.8
Scene Consistency
67.5
23.4
Cinematography
67.6
29.6
2D Animation
61.3
9.7
3D Animation
45.0
25.7
Human
67.4
25.0
Actor Performance
55.0
34.7
Objects
55.1
26.0
Animals
54.2
39.4
Text Fidelity
21.7
1.7

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Kling 2.6 leads here by 20.0 points.

Matched Text outputs from Kling 2.6 and Infinity Star
Loading video
Kling 2.6
Loading video
Infinity Star

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Kling 2.6 leads here by 45.0 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Kling 2.6 and Infinity Star
Loading video
Kling 2.6
Loading video
Infinity Star

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Kling 2.6 leads here by 38.0 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Kling 2.6 and Infinity Star
Loading video
Kling 2.6
Loading video
Infinity Star

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityKling 2.6Infinity Star
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 2.6 better than Infinity Star?

Kling 2.6 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Kling 2.6 cheaper than Infinity Star?

Infinity Star costs less at $0.84 per minute, compared with $8.40 for Kling 2.6.

Does Kling 2.6 generate audio?

Yes, Kling 2.6 includes audio output.

Does Infinity Star generate audio?

No, Infinity Star does not include audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Kling 2.6 or Infinity Star?

Kling 2.6 supports longer clips at 10 seconds, compared with 5 seconds for Infinity Star.

Which model scores higher on 2D Animation, Kling 2.6 or Infinity Star?

Kling 2.6 scores higher for 2D animation.

Which model scores higher on Physics, Kling 2.6 or Infinity Star?

Kling 2.6 scores higher for motion and physical behavior.

How are Kling 2.6 and Infinity Star compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 2.6 and Infinity Star

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.