Compare
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 2
Kling 3 Pro edges out Veo 2 overall (Kling 3 Pro 62.0 vs Veo 2 55.0.) Kling 3 Pro is a clear upgrade from Kling 2.6 and the Veo 3.1 models on most dimensions. It excels at human performance and emotive acting, has some of the best prompt understanding of any model, and produces cinematic, well-composed shots with standout animal realism. It can very fluidly go from slow motion to regular speed, showing really good temporal coherence. It can generate some nonsensical outputs, so expect to run a few prompts to get it right. But when it gets it right, it's quite good. 2D animation and anime are average. Text rendering is just okay and may require some re-prompting. The main tradeoffs are in Expensive, Can generate nonsensical outputs, where Veo 2 tends to score better.
Kling 3 ProKling | Veo 2Google |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | — | — |
| Image output | ||
| Audio output | — | — |
Providers
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Kling 3 Pro leads on physics (+3.0), with a measurable advantage over Veo 2. The clearest separation is on Physics (+3.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Kling 3 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+10.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 2. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+23.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Veo 2 leads on aesthetics (+2.1), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+4.4). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 2 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Taste
Prompt
A cinematic hummingbird hovering over vivid flowers at sunrise, 8s
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Kling 3 Pro leads on animation (+17.9), with a measurable advantage over Veo 2. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+24.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-painted rotoscope: a ballerina performs fouettés, traced from live reference but stylized with ink outlines and watercolor fills. The motion is realistic but the look is distinctly illustrated.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-drawn puppy 2D cel-shaded animation style: a golden retriever pup with floppy ears chases a butterfly through a meadow, trips over its own paws, rolls, and bounds up joyfully. Watercolor backgrounds, expressive line work, heartwarming motion.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Kling 3 Pro leads on humans (+12.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 2. The clearest separation is on Human (+23.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Human
Prompt
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Hands
Prompt
Close up of a wrinkled elderly woman's weathered hands carefully folding an origami crane. Paper creases with each deliberate fold, fingers moving with practiced precision. Soft warm lighting, intimate macro detail.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 2 leads on objects and animals (+4.9), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Animals (+10.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 2 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Animals
Prompt
A wet dog shakes itself dry in glorious slow motion. Water droplets spiral off. Fur contorts into absurd shapes. Joy radiates from its face.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Objects
Prompt
Raindrops land on a leather jacket. The water beads, rolls off, darkens the leather where it lingers. The jacket's texture stays locked.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Kling 3 Pro and Veo 2 are effectively tied on text, with small tradeoffs across the metrics. The biggest separation is on Text Fidelity (0.3), but it's not decisive overall. In practice, you should decide based on the specific sub-metric you care about most, since neither model consistently dominates this slice of the rubric.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Times Square at night: massive LED billboards display rotating ads. COCA-COLA, SAMSUNG, BROADWAY SHOWS.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Veo 2 leads on cost and speed (+19706.7), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Latency (+59150.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Veo 2 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Veo 2 |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2
3D Animation
Prompt
CGI animated kitten discovers snow: a fluffy orange tabby steps onto fresh powder for the first time, paw sinking in. Startled shake, curious sniff, then gleeful pouncing. Fur dynamics, subsurface scattering on ears, irresistible charm.
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Veo 2