AI video model comparison

HappyHorse-1.0 vs Kling 3 Pro

By Megaton TeamJuly 25, 2026

HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro finish level overall. Neither model is the clear winner.

Share
HappyHorse-1.0
Kling 3 Pro

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro are evenly matched

HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro have the same overall score. HappyHorse-1.0 has its biggest lead in hands, while Kling 3 Pro leads most in actor performance.

Alibaba (Wan)

Alibaba (Wan)

HappyHorse-1.0

62.0Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$8.40/min
Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 3 Pro

62.0Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$10.08/min

Best for

Highest overall score

HappyHorse-1.0

HappyHorse-1.0 leads the overall score by 0.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

HappyHorse-1.0

HappyHorse-1.0 leads by 11.8 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

HappyHorse-1.0

HappyHorse-1.0 runs $8.40/min, against $10.08/min for Kling 3 Pro.

Provider prices can change.

187
videos rated
5,423
measurements
748
ratings
July 25, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

HappyHorse-1.0 wins 10 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapHands: HappyHorse-1.0 ahead by 20.5 points.
Closest categoryLogic Consistency: HappyHorse-1.0 ahead by 0.8 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

HappyHorse-1.0Kling 3 Pro
Physics
50.9
59.3
Prompt Adherence
71.8
63.5
Logic Consistency
62.4
61.6
Scene Consistency
52.1
61.0
Cinematography
66.8
63.3
2D Animation
57.3
47.3
3D Animation
64.4
60.0
Anime Animation
57.8
51.3
Human
67.2
75.9
Hands
78.3
57.8
Actor Performance
62.8
79.3
Objects
62.7
57.9
Animals
69.7
65.8
Text Fidelity
65.5
53.7

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

HappyHorse-1.0
115 videos rated · Jul 2026
Kling 3 Pro
72 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

HappyHorse-1.0Kling 3 Pro

HappyHorse-1.0's biggest lead: Technical cleanliness, 59.0% versus 43.0%.

Kling 3 Pro's biggest lead: Motion stability, 68.0 versus 41.0.

Technical cleanliness
59.0%
43.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
100.0%
93.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
97.0%
99.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
41.0
68.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
61.0
73.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

HappyHorse-1.0 leads here by 11.8 points.

Show the full prompt

Stylized commercial cinematic shot, locked-off down a quiet European cobblestone street as enormous shiny hot-pink balloon letters spelling "DON'T SWEAT IT" wobble in a gentle breeze, the apostrophe bobbing slightly out of formation before drifting back into place. Sunlight glints off each balloon's curvature, soft squeaks audible as they sway. Sherbet color palette, hand-arranged confetti drifting past, every letter clean and properly kerned regardless of motion, optimistic streetwear-campaign energy.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro
Loading video
HappyHorse-1.0
Loading video
Kling 3 Pro

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Kling 3 Pro leads here by 8.4 points.

Show the full prompt

Cozy macro tabletop scene, top-down framing on an open hardback storybook resting on a thick knit blanket, the left page bearing illuminated calligraphy reading "Once upon a time, in a kingdom far far away…" as a hand gently turns the page to reveal a watercolor castle on a green hill. Warm bedside lamp glow, dust motes drifting, fingertips brushing the parchment, every letter perfectly legible and consistent through the motion, the storyteller-intimate scale of a hand-painted childhood.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro
Loading video
HappyHorse-1.0
Loading video
Kling 3 Pro

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

HappyHorse-1.0 leads here by 3.5 points.

Show the full prompt

Extreme wide-angle 16mm-style fisheye, locked-off on the bow of a tall ship as an adult sailor crouches near the camera, the bowsprit and rigging curving around him in distorted arcs, gray Atlantic swell heaving behind. Wind whips his curls, ropes thump against masts. Heavy practical grain, vignetted edges, desaturated blues and bone whites, archival expedition film texture.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro
Loading video
HappyHorse-1.0
Loading video
Kling 3 Pro

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityHappyHorse-1.0Kling 3 Pro
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesNo
Audio inputYesNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is HappyHorse-1.0 better than Kling 3 Pro?

They have the same overall score.

Is HappyHorse-1.0 cheaper than Kling 3 Pro?

HappyHorse-1.0 costs less at $8.40 per minute, compared with $10.08 for Kling 3 Pro.

Does HappyHorse-1.0 generate audio?

Yes, HappyHorse-1.0 includes audio output.

Does Kling 3 Pro generate audio?

Yes, Kling 3 Pro includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, HappyHorse-1.0 or Kling 3 Pro?

Both models list a 15-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on Hands, HappyHorse-1.0 or Kling 3 Pro?

HappyHorse-1.0 scores higher for hands.

Which model scores higher on Actor Performance, HappyHorse-1.0 or Kling 3 Pro?

Kling 3 Pro scores higher for actor performance.

How are HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro compared?

Megaton compares each model's latest published scores. The side-by-side videos use the same prompts.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs HappyHorse-1.0ByteDanceAlibaba73.0 / 62.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling73.0 / 62.0
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs HappyHorse-1.0ByteDanceAlibaba70.0 / 62.0
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling70.0 / 62.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Veo 3AlibabaGoogle62.0 / 60.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 2.6KlingKling62.0 / 60.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3KlingGoogle62.0 / 60.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Grok Imagine 1.0Klingxai62.0 / 58.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Veo 2AlibabaGoogle62.0 / 56.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Veo 3.1AlibabaGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 2KlingGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1KlingGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs PixVerse v5.5KlingPixVerse62.0 / 55.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Grok 2025Klingxai62.0 / 54.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 1.5 ProKlingByteDance62.0 / 53.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastAlibabaGoogle62.0 / 51.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastKlingGoogle62.0 / 51.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Sora 2 ProKlingOpenAI62.0 / 50.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Veo 3 FastAlibabaGoogle62.0 / 48.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3 FastKlingGoogle62.0 / 48.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Vidu Q2KlingVidu62.0 / 45.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX-2 19BKlingLightricks62.0 / 43.0
HappyHorse-1.0 vs Gen-4.5AlibabaRunway62.0 / 40.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5KlingRunway62.0 / 40.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoKlingPika62.0 / 26.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Infinity StarKlingFoundationVision62.0 / 24.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 FastByteDanceByteDance73.0 / 70.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 2.6ByteDanceKling73.0 / 60.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3ByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 60.0
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Veo 3ByteDanceGoogle70.0 / 60.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Grok Imagine 1.0ByteDancexai73.0 / 58.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 2ByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 56.0

Methodology

How we tested HappyHorse-1.0 and Kling 3 Pro

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Scores come from each model's latest published evaluation. The side-by-side videos use the same prompts so you can compare the results directly.
File reliability
Automated checks review 187 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 25, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Weekly AI Video Rankings

Get weekly leaderboard changes and AI video model launches delivered to your inbox.