Swipe for more top models
Compare
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Kling 3 Pro
Kling 3 Pro edges out Grok Imagine 1.0 overall (Grok Imagine 1.0 58.0 vs Kling 3 Pro 62.0.) Kling 3 Pro is a clear upgrade from Kling 2.6 and the Veo 3.1 models on most dimensions. It excels at human performance and emotive acting, has some of the best prompt understanding of any model, and produces cinematic, well-composed shots with standout animal realism. It can very fluidly go from slow motion to regular speed, showing really good temporal coherence. It can generate some nonsensical outputs, so expect to run a few prompts to get it right. But when it gets it right, it's quite good. 2D animation and anime are average. Text rendering is just okay and may require some re-prompting. The main tradeoffs are in Expensive, Can generate nonsensical outputs, where Grok Imagine 1.0 tends to score better.
Grok Imagine 1.0xai | Kling 3 ProKling |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
xai
xAI
xai is the platform that serves Grok Imagine 1.0 requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 3 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Kling 3 Pro leads on physics (+18.9), with a measurable advantage over Grok Imagine 1.0. The clearest separation is on Physics (+18.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 40.4 | 59.3 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Grok Imagine 1.0 and Kling 3 Pro are effectively tied on prompt and logic, with small tradeoffs across the metrics. The biggest separation is on Scene Consistency (6.1), but it's not decisive overall. In practice, you should decide based on the specific sub-metric you care about most, since neither model consistently dominates this slice of the rubric.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 66.7 | 63.5 |
| Logic Consistency | 66.7 | 61.6 |
| Scene Consistency | 54.9 | 61.0 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Kling 3 Pro leads on aesthetics (+1.3), with a measurable advantage over Grok Imagine 1.0. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+2.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 60.7 | 63.3 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Grok Imagine 1.0 leads on animation (+19.7), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+25.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Grok Imagine 1.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 71.7 | 47.3 |
| 3D Animation | 85.0 | 60.0 |
| Anime Animation | 61.0 | 51.3 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Kling 3 Pro leads on humans (+8.5), with a measurable advantage over Grok Imagine 1.0. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+17.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 65.6 | 75.9 |
| Hands | 59.7 | 57.8 |
| Actor Performance | 64.0 | 81.0 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Kling 3 Pro leads on objects and animals (+7.7), with a measurable advantage over Grok Imagine 1.0. The clearest separation is on Animals (+12.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 54.7 | 57.9 |
| Animals | 53.6 | 65.8 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Grok Imagine 1.0 leads on text (+15.3), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+15.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Grok Imagine 1.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 69.0 | 53.7 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Grok Imagine 1.0 leads on cost and speed (+20002.4), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Latency (+60000.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Grok Imagine 1.0 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok Imagine 1.0 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.050 | $0.168 |
| Price / min | $3.00 | $10.08 |
| Latency | 0ms | 60.0s |