Swipe for more top models
Compare
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3 Fast
Veo 3.1 Fast edges out Veo 3 Fast overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs Veo 3 Fast 48.0.) Veo 3.1 Fast looks stronger on Humans, Objects and Animals, Physics, Text. The main tradeoffs are in Cost and Speed, Animation, Prompt and Logic, where Veo 3 Fast tends to score better.
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | Veo 3 FastGoogle |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | — | — |
| Image output | ||
| Audio output | — |
Providers
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on physics (+3.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+3.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.7 | 42.0 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Veo 3 Fast leads on prompt and logic (+0.8), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Prompt Adherence (+4.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 44.0 | 48.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 41.5 | 40.7 |
| Scene Consistency | 50.7 | 50.0 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on aesthetics (+2.4), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+4.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 48.7 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Veo 3 Fast leads on animation (+11.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+36.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 27.7 | 37.7 |
| 3D Animation | 15.0 | 51.3 |
| Anime Animation | 54.3 | 43.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on humans (+11.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Hands (+32.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 55.3 | 53.2 |
| Hands | 77.3 | 44.7 |
| Actor Performance | 56.3 | 56.7 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on objects and animals (+6.4), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+9.1). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.6 | 53.9 |
| Animals | 55.1 | 46.0 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on text (+2.7), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+2.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 47.7 | 45.0 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Veo 3 Fast leads on cost and speed (+14.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+43.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Price / min | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Latency | 638ms | 595ms |