Compare

Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 edges out Veo 3.1 Fast overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs Veo 3.1 56.0.) Veo 3.1 looks stronger on Animation, Physics, Prompt and Logic, Objects and Animals. The main tradeoffs are in Cost and Speed, Text, Humans, where Veo 3.1 Fast tends to score better.

Google
Google
Veo 3.1 Fast
51
51
Total Score
Veo 3.1 Fast
View
rank
#11
cost
6.00
/min
speed
638
ms
Google
Google
Veo 3.1
56
56
Total Score
Veo 3.1
View
rank
#6
cost
12.00
/min
speed
935
ms
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle
Veo 3.1Google
Good for
  • Cost and Speed
  • Text
  • Humans
  • Aesthetics
Good for
  • Animation
  • Physics
  • Prompt and Logic
  • Objects and Animals
Bad for
  • Animation
  • Physics
  • Prompt and Logic
Bad for
  • Cost and Speed
  • Text
  • Humans
Modalities
CapabilityVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Text input
Image input
Video input
Audio input——
Image output
Audio output——

Providers

Google
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Google
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 requests, pricing, and availability.

Physics

Veo 3.1 leads on physics (+10.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+10.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Physics45.755.9

Prompt Comparisons

Physics
Prompt
Macro slow-motion underwater shot, frontal portrait of a young woman drifting just beneath a glassy surface with cushioned headphones on, eyes serenely closed, her face haloed by suspended cornflowers and chrysanthemums slowly orbiting in the current. Bubbles trace lazy arcs upward, dappled light fracturing across her freckled skin. Deep cobalt and violet palette, no struggle, only the unhurried weightlessness of complete calm.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Physics
Prompt
Stylized art-direction motion piece, locked frontal medium shot on a classical marble bust set against a saturated cinnabar-red backdrop, a crown of glowing orange silk ribbons and tiny sparks swirling above its hair. The stone remains undamaged beneath the kinetic light. Hard side key light carving each curl in shadow, gentle smoke-like haze rising past the frame, the elegant intensity of an icon held under theatrical illumination.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Anime walking-shot in the style of a quiet contemporary anime film, low POV camera tracking forward over a dirt road, framing a person's worn sneakers and beige cargo pants stepping in steady rhythm. Ahead, a small valley town spills downhill under a blazing orange sunset streaked with telephone lines and clouds. Painterly clouds with rim-lit edges, hand-drawn dust puffs at each step, the kind of contemplative end-of-day walk that doesn't need narration.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Prompt and Logic

Veo 3.1 leads on prompt and logic (+9.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Prompt Adherence (+23.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Prompt Adherence44.067.0
Logic Consistency41.547.2
Scene Consistency50.750.6

Prompt Comparisons

Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Classic cinematic homage, soaring wide shot of a colossal gorilla clinging to the silver tip of a deco skyscraper, one massive fist raised at three biplanes banking around it in tight figure-eights. Below, a sprawling 1930s metropolis bakes in afternoon haze, propeller drone audible. Hybrid black-and-white-meets-color grade, fine 35mm grain, the iconic theatrical scale of an old-school spectacle staged with modern fidelity. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Stylized 2D cinematic close-up, a young woman in profile applying deep red lipstick with deliberate care, her reflection visible in a vanity mirror as she purses, smooths, and presses her lips together. Behind her, painterly cumulus drift across an unrealistically saturated cyan sky. Bold linework, comic-book inking with cel-shading, color-block backdrop, the small private ritual of putting on a face for the world.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Anime cinematic shot, low-angle hero composition of a young mage in a slate cloak standing center-frame as luminous white energy ribbons spiral up from the moss around his feet and weave through the canopy of a primeval forest. Eyes closed, hands clasped in concentration, robe lifting subtly. Sun shafts piercing the trees, painterly Shinkai sky peeking through, ribbons animating in fluid 2D ink-and-light strokes, the held silence of summoned focus.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Aesthetics

Veo 3.1 Fast leads on aesthetics (+3.0), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+6.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Cinematography53.447.3
Taste——
Quality0.50.6

Prompt Comparisons

Cinematography
Prompt
70s Kodachrome-grain motion picture footage, telephoto compression tracking shot of an adult runner in saffron shorts moving through chest-high wheat alongside a long-haired white farm dog, both bounding in syncopated leaps. Cobalt cloudless sky, golden stalks lit from behind, a hint of overexposure flaring the highlights. Slight gate weave, soft anamorphic flares, the unhurried freedom of a quiet Sunday afternoon.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Cinematography
Prompt
Cinematic medium-wide tracking shot through a sunlit primeval forest, a robed rider sidesaddle on a pale long-maned steed picking its way slowly between mossy oaks, dust motes hanging in cathedral shafts of light. The animal exhales, mane lifting in a soft updraft, her gaze fixed gently forward. Lush emerald-and-amber grade, anamorphic compression, the unhurried pace of a fable, no soundtrack but birdsong and hooffalls on leaf litter. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Cinematography
Prompt
High-contrast black-and-white aerial, locked overhead shot of a boxing ring with one figure seated low in shadow at the bottom of frame as two opponents circle each other slowly in the bright square below, long shadows pinwheeling. The crowd is invisible blackness beyond the ropes. Single hard top-down light pool, crushed blacks, soft 35mm grain, the choreographed stillness of a Wong Kar-wai standoff.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Animation

Veo 3.1 leads on animation (+17.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+39.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
2D Animation27.746.0
3D Animation15.054.0
Anime Animation54.348.3

Prompt Comparisons

3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized 3D animated sequence, slow tracking shot following a hefty woolly bovine sauntering down a narrow aisle of an antique porcelain boutique, glass shelves crammed with delicate vases on either side. Each heavy footstep makes the floorboards tremble, lamps swaying, a single vase teetering and almost falling. Warm amber gallery lighting, plush carpet underfoot, the held-breath tension of inevitable collision, animated with deliberate weight and timing.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Human
Prompt
High-fashion editorial motion shot, locked symmetrical frame of a model in a tailored mint flight-attendant uniform leaning against a stack of matching pastel suitcases, fingertips delicately raised, lips painted carmine, eyes tracking imperceptibly toward camera. Background a single saturated mint-green wall. Mid-century travel-poster styling, slow micro-movements, polished commercial lighting, the cool poise of an entire era distilled into one held pose. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Human
Prompt
Lo-fi anime study, side tracking shot of a young woman in a teal track jacket jogging steadily down a hazy hillside boulevard at golden hour, headphones on, ponytail bouncing in rhythm. The city stretches behind her in painterly silhouettes, smog turning the light strawberry-orange. Hand-painted gradients, limited animation on twos, calm exhale visible in cooler air, the meditative loop of an evening run.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Humans

Veo 3.1 Fast leads on humans (+3.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+16.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Human55.361.9
Hands77.376.3
Actor Performance56.340.0

Prompt Comparisons

Human
Prompt
Stylized Disney-revival 2D animation, three-quarter framing on a regal young woman in pleated white linen perched on the arm of a sandstone throne, chin resting on a slender hand, two black cats curling at her sandaled feet. She watches something off-frame with a slow, knowing blink, kohl-lined eyes flicking. Warm gold and turquoise palette, hand-painted hieroglyphic backdrop, subtle hair sway, the imperious patience of someone who already knows how this ends.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Human
Prompt
Stylized fashion campaign motion piece, locked symmetrical wide on a young man in pastel sportswear lounging on a single chair at center-court, one sneaker propped on a cooler box of citrus, phone held to his ear. He nods slowly to whatever he's hearing, the corner of his mouth lifting. Pastel-pink and turquoise color blocking, bougainvillea bursting at the edges, midday sun flattening shadows, Wes Anderson symmetry, no movement except his breath and a single ice cube clinking.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Human
Prompt
Sumptuous cinematic frame, locked medium shot on a lean young man slouched on a heavy ornate throne, one arm draped over the carved rest, the other resting near a chalice and a jeweled blade. Firelight from candelabras flickers across oiled skin and the dull glint of coin piles at his feet. Velvet drapes shift in a draft, his gaze flicks toward camera, faintly amused. Caravaggio chiaroscuro, deep crimsons and tarnished gold, the still arrogance of inherited power.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Objects and Animals

Veo 3.1 leads on objects and animals (+8.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+12.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Objects57.661.7
Animals55.168.0

Prompt Comparisons

Objects
Prompt
Editorial fashion commercial shot, slow vertical crane move rising from base level up to eye-level on a deep oxblood-red leather handbag perched on a circular white plinth, gold padlock and tassel swaying delicately as a curtain of cream silk drapery behind it ripples in a gentle off-screen breeze. Warm tungsten film grade, narrow shaft of light caressing the leather grain, museum-like reverence, the quiet drama of a single object held under a single beam.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Objects
Prompt
Graphic-design product shot, locked symmetrical frame of a tall clear glass bottle with vibrant magenta-and-yellow label split exactly between a deep teal and a hot-pink color block backdrop, a single palm leaf casting an animated soft shadow as it sways off-camera. Hard direct sun shifts subtly, gradient highlights tracing the curvature. Memphis-meets-minimalism styling, saturated to the edge of acid, the bottle held like a sculpture under tropical noon. ---
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Objects
Prompt
Hyper-slow-motion macro at 4000fps, frontal close-up of an icy lime cocktail glass as a cascade of crystalline water erupts upward through the rim, droplets suspended in mid-air like glass beads, condensation streaking the sides. Tropical bokeh of turquoise sea and palm fronds dissolves behind. Razor-sharp focus on the splash crown, golden rim of late-afternoon sun, the kind of frozen-time food-commercial moment that lasts a full beat too long.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Text

Veo 3.1 Fast leads on text (+8.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+8.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Text Fidelity47.739.5

Prompt Comparisons

Hands
Prompt
Cinematic medium two-shot on a misty fantasy training field, a tired knight in dented plate kneeling as a hooded healer in pale linen gently lays her palm over his dusty vambrace, a faint warm glow pulsing beneath her fingers. Embers from a nearby campfire drift between them, distant figures rendered out of focus. Soft golden magic-hour light pierces the haze, painterly anamorphic frame, the held tension between relief and unfinished duty.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Hands
Prompt
Anime composition, medium close-up profile of an archer in a midnight cloak drawing back a longbow, fingers gripping bowstring with deliberate precision as the arrow trembles at full draw. Moonlight filters through cobalt forest canopy, painting one side of her face cool silver. Cel-shaded with painterly background, particles of pollen drifting through the beams, her exhale frosting just before the release.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Hands
Prompt
Photoreal CG surreal moment, extreme depth composition: in the soft-focused foreground a giantess gazes serenely while pressing her thumb to her lips, and on the pad of that thumb a tiny suited human figure stands frozen, watching the wind rake her eyelashes. Below, a hazy metropolis fades into smog. Sharp focus on her freckled skin and on him, gentle bokeh on the middle ground, the impossible scale rendered with unsettling photographic honesty.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1

Cost and Speed

Veo 3.1 Fast leads on cost and speed (+101.0), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1. The clearest separation is on Latency (+297.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1
Price / sec$0.100$0.200
Price / min$6.00$12.00
Latency638ms935ms

Prompt Comparisons

Hands
Prompt
Stylized anime cooking sequence, overhead three-quarter framing on a sharp-featured young chef in a green apron rhythmically chopping ripe tomatoes on a wood block, knife flashing in tight precise arcs, fingers curled in proper claw grip. Juice beads on the blade between cuts, the kitchen behind him dim and steamy, kettle hissing. Crisp cel-shading on the knuckles, rich olive and crimson palette, the controlled aggression of an artisan in flow.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Objects
Prompt
Luxury commercial product shot, slow 360-degree turntable on a square olive-glass bottle with a brushed amber cap, a single silk ribbon and small ivory label fluttering as the platform rotates. Long soft shadow stretches across the warm beige seamless. Polished beauty lighting, micro-reflections traveling along the glass edges, dust motes catching in a single hair-light, hushed minimalist counter-display elegance, 8K macro precision.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1
Objects
Prompt
Stylized still-life commercial shot, locked-off on a cream 1980s CRT television set against a sage backdrop, its screen alive with a hand-painted urban garden of vines, miniature towers, and tiny solar panels that subtly animate inside the screen as if the world within is breathing. The plastic housing reflects a faint warm key light, dust hanging in the air. Conceptual museum-piece styling, slight CRT scanline shimmer, the gentle whir of a vacuum tube barely audible.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Veo 3.1