Swipe for more top models
Compare
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2 19B
Veo 3.1 Fast edges out LTX-2 19B overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs LTX-2 19B 43.0.) Veo 3.1 Fast looks stronger on Text, Humans, Prompt and Logic, Objects and Animals. The main tradeoffs are in Animation, where LTX-2 19B tends to score better.
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | LTX-2 19BLightricks |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | — | — |
| Image output | ||
| Audio output | — | — |
Providers
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Lightricks
lightricks
Lightricks is the platform that serves LTX-2 19B requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on physics (+3.9), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Physics (+3.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.7 | 41.9 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on prompt and logic (+5.8), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+24.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 44.0 | 50.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 41.5 | 16.8 |
| Scene Consistency | 50.7 | 52.2 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Veo 3.1 Fast and LTX-2 19B are effectively tied on aesthetics, with small tradeoffs across the metrics. The biggest separation is on Quality (0.2), but it's not decisive overall. In practice, you should decide based on the specific sub-metric you care about most, since neither model consistently dominates this slice of the rubric.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 53.4 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
LTX-2 19B leads on animation (+7.1), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+27.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, LTX-2 19B is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 27.7 | 55.0 |
| 3D Animation | 15.0 | 28.3 |
| Anime Animation | 54.3 | 35.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on humans (+22.1), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Hands (+42.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 55.3 | 33.6 |
| Hands | 77.3 | 34.6 |
| Actor Performance | 56.3 | 54.3 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on objects and animals (+5.2), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Objects (+10.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.6 | 47.6 |
| Animals | 55.1 | 54.6 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on text (+28.3), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+28.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 47.7 | 19.3 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
LTX-2 19B leads on cost and speed (+214.5), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+638.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, LTX-2 19B is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2 19B |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.100 | $0.040 |
| Price / min | $6.00 | $0.58 |
| Latency | 638ms | 0ms |