AI video model comparison

Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Veo 3.1 is the better overall choice over Veo 3.1 Fast. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Veo 3.1
Veo 3.1 Fast

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Veo 3.1 is the better choice

Veo 3.1 scores higher than Veo 3.1 Fast in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in 3D animation, but Veo 3.1 Fast costs less.

Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 3.1

56.0Overall score
Rank
#8
Price per minute
$24.00/min
Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 3.1 Fast

51.0Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$6.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads the overall score by 5.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1 Fast leads by 8.2 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1 Fast runs $6/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

241
videos rated
6,989
measurements
964
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Veo 3.1 wins 8 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Veo 3.1 ahead by 39.0 points.
Closest categoryScene Consistency: Veo 3.1 Fast ahead by 0.1 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

Veo 3.1Veo 3.1 Fast
Physics
55.9
45.7
Prompt Adherence
67.0
44.0
Logic Consistency
47.2
41.5
Scene Consistency
50.6
50.7
Cinematography
47.3
53.4
2D Animation
46.0
27.7
3D Animation
54.0
15.0
Anime Animation
48.3
54.3
Human
61.9
55.3
Hands
76.3
77.3
Actor Performance
40.0
56.3
Objects
61.7
57.6
Animals
68.0
55.1
Text Fidelity
39.5
47.7

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Veo 3.1
120 videos rated · Jun 2026
Veo 3.1 Fast
121 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Veo 3.1Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1's biggest lead: Motion stability, 59.0 versus 57.0.

Veo 3.1 Fast's biggest lead: Technical cleanliness, 74.0% versus 68.0%.

Technical cleanliness
68.0%
74.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
88.0%
93.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
91.0%
92.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
59.0
57.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
75.0
78.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 Fast leads here by 8.2 points.

Show the full prompt

Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 3.1
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 10.2 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 3.1
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 Fast leads here by 6.0 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 3.1
Veo 3.1 Fast

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityVeo 3.1Veo 3.1 Fast
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Veo 3.1 better than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Veo 3.1 cheaper than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 Fast costs less at $6 per minute, compared with $24 for Veo 3.1.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 includes audio output.

Does Veo 3.1 Fast generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 Fast includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Veo 3.1 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Both models list a 8-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Veo 3.1 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for 3D animation.

Which model scores higher on Prompt Adherence, Veo 3.1 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for following the prompt.

How are Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1KlingGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 3.1KlingGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Veo 3 vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 51.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3.1xaiGoogle58.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastKlingGoogle62.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle56.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 3.1 FastKlingGoogle60.0 / 51.0
Veo 3 vs Veo 3.1 FastGoogleGoogle60.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs PixVerse v5.5GooglePixVerse56.0 / 55.0
Veo 3.1 vs Grok 2025Googlexai56.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle58.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance56.0 / 53.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2 ProGoogleOpenAI56.0 / 50.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Veo 3.1 FastPixVerseGoogle55.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 48.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs Vidu Q2GoogleVidu56.0 / 45.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastByteDanceGoogle53.0 / 51.0
Veo 3.1 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks56.0 / 43.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Sora 2 ProGoogleOpenAI51.0 / 50.0
Veo 3.1 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika56.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3 FastGoogleGoogle51.0 / 48.0
Veo 3.1 vs Infinity StarGoogleFoundationVision56.0 / 24.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Vidu Q2GoogleVidu51.0 / 45.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks51.0 / 43.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway51.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika51.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Infinity StarGoogleFoundationVision51.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 241 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.