Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
#5
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V1

Veo 3.1 vs LTX-2 19B

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Veo 3.1 is the better overall choice over LTX-2 19B. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Veo 3.1
LTX-2 19B
Our verdict

Veo 3.1 is the better choice

Veo 3.1 scores higher than LTX-2 19B in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in hands, and it also supports longer clips.

Google

Google

Veo 3.1

56.0Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$24.00/min
Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX-2 19B

43.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$2.39/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads the overall score by 13.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads by 20.2 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

LTX-2 19B

LTX-2 19B runs $2.39/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

92
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Veo 3.1 wins 8 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapLogic Consistency: Veo 3.1 ahead by 30.3 points.
Closest categoryScene Consistency: LTX-2 19B ahead by 1.6 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Veo 3.1LTX-2 19B
Physics
55.9
41.9
Prompt Adherence
67.0
50.0
Logic Consistency
47.2
16.8
Scene Consistency
50.6
52.2
Cinematography
47.3
53.4
2D Animation
46.0
55.0
3D Animation
54.0
28.3
Human
61.9
33.6
Actor Performance
40.0
54.3
Objects
61.7
47.6
Animals
68.0
54.6
Text Fidelity
39.5
19.3

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 20.2 points.

Matched Text outputs from Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 14.0 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

LTX-2 19B leads here by 6.1 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Veo 3.1 detailsSee full LTX-2 19B details
CapabilityVeo 3.1LTX-2 19B
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoYes
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Veo 3.1 better than LTX-2 19B?

Veo 3.1 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Veo 3.1 cheaper than LTX-2 19B?

LTX-2 19B costs less at $2.39 per minute, compared with $24 for Veo 3.1.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 includes audio output.

Does LTX-2 19B generate audio?

Yes, LTX-2 19B includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Veo 3.1 or LTX-2 19B?

Veo 3.1 supports longer clips at 8 seconds, compared with 5 seconds for LTX-2 19B.

Which model scores higher on Hands, Veo 3.1 or LTX-2 19B?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for hands.

Which model scores higher on Logic Consistency, Veo 3.1 or LTX-2 19B?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for logical consistency.

How are Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 19B compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

Continue researching

Veo 3.1

LTX-2 19B

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 56.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 19B

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.