AI video model comparison

Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1 Fast

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Veo 2 is the better overall choice over Veo 3.1 Fast. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Veo 2
Veo 3.1 Fast

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Veo 2 is the better choice

Veo 2 scores higher than Veo 3.1 Fast in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in 3D animation, but Veo 3.1 Fast costs less.

Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 2

56.0Overall score
Rank
#8
Price per minute
$21.00/min
Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 3.1 Fast

51.0Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$6.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Veo 2

Veo 2 leads the overall score by 5.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 2

Veo 2 leads by 6.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1 Fast runs $6/min, against $21/min for Veo 2.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 3.1 Fast generates audio with the video; Veo 2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

243
videos rated
6,925
measurements
972
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Veo 2 wins 9 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Veo 2 ahead by 39.5 points.
Closest categoryObjects: Veo 2 ahead by 0.1 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

Veo 2Veo 3.1 Fast
Physics
56.2
45.7
Prompt Adherence
58.0
44.0
Logic Consistency
38.3
41.5
Scene Consistency
57.7
50.7
Cinematography
67.7
53.4
2D Animation
23.0
27.7
3D Animation
54.5
15.0
Anime Animation
27.3
54.3
Human
52.7
55.3
Hands
59.9
77.3
Actor Performance
65.3
56.3
Objects
57.8
57.6
Animals
75.8
55.1
Text Fidelity
54.0
47.7

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Veo 2
122 videos rated · Jul 2026
Veo 3.1 Fast
121 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Veo 2Veo 3.1 Fast

Veo 2's biggest lead: Clean framing, 96.0% versus 92.0%.

Veo 3.1 Fast's biggest lead: Technical cleanliness, 74.0% versus 64.0%.

Technical cleanliness
64.0%
74.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
91.0%
93.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
96.0%
92.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
52.0
57.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
69.0
78.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 6.3 points.

Show the full prompt

Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 2
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 10.5 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 2
Veo 3.1 Fast

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Veo 2 leads here by 14.4 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Veo 2 and Veo 3.1 Fast
Veo 2
Veo 3.1 Fast

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityVeo 2Veo 3.1 Fast
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Veo 2 better than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 2 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Veo 2 cheaper than Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 Fast costs less at $6 per minute, compared with $21 for Veo 2.

Does Veo 2 generate audio?

No, Veo 2 does not include audio output.

Does Veo 3.1 Fast generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 Fast includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Veo 2 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Both models list a 8-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Veo 2 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 2 scores higher for 3D animation.

Which model scores higher on Anime Animation, Veo 2 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Veo 3.1 Fast scores higher for anime.

How are Veo 2 and Veo 3.1 Fast compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 2ByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 2KlingGoogle62.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 2KlingGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Veo 3 vs Veo 2GoogleGoogle60.0 / 56.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastByteDanceGoogle73.0 / 51.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 2xaiGoogle58.0 / 56.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastKlingGoogle62.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle56.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 3.1 FastKlingGoogle60.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs PixVerse v5.5GooglePixVerse56.0 / 55.0
Veo 3 vs Veo 3.1 FastGoogleGoogle60.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Grok 2025Googlexai56.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle58.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Seedance 1.5 ProGoogleByteDance56.0 / 53.0
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Sora 2 ProGoogleOpenAI56.0 / 50.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Veo 3.1 FastPixVerseGoogle55.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Veo 3 FastGoogleGoogle56.0 / 48.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs Vidu Q2GoogleVidu56.0 / 45.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Veo 3.1 FastByteDanceGoogle53.0 / 51.0
Veo 2 vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks56.0 / 43.0
Veo 2 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 40.0
Veo 2 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika56.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Sora 2 ProGoogleOpenAI51.0 / 50.0
Veo 2 vs Infinity StarGoogleFoundationVision56.0 / 24.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3 FastGoogleGoogle51.0 / 48.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Vidu Q2GoogleVidu51.0 / 45.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2 19BGoogleLightricks51.0 / 43.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway51.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika51.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Infinity StarGoogleFoundationVision51.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Veo 2 and Veo 3.1 Fast

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 243 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.