Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V2

Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Veo 2

By Megaton TeamJuly 25, 2026

Seedance 2.0 Fast is the clear winner over Veo 2. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown and costs less.

Share
Add as preferred source
Seedance 2.0 Fast
Veo 2
Our verdict

Seedance 2.0 Fast is the clear winner

Seedance 2.0 Fast scores higher than Veo 2 in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in 2D animation, and it also costs less.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0 Fast

70.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$4.54/min
Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind

Veo 2

56.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$21.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 Fast leads the overall score by 14.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 Fast leads by 13.7 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 Fast runs $4.54/min, against $21/min for Veo 2.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 Fast generates audio with the video; Veo 2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

122
videos rated
3,416
measurements
488
ratings
July 25, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 2.0 Fast wins 10 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap2D Animation: Seedance 2.0 Fast ahead by 43.8 points.
Closest categoryPhysics: Seedance 2.0 Fast ahead by 1.6 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 2.0 FastVeo 2
Physics
57.8
56.2
Prompt Adherence
68.4
58.0
Logic Consistency
68.1
38.3
Scene Consistency
54.5
57.7
Cinematography
74.7
67.7
2D Animation
66.8
23.0
3D Animation
65.7
54.5
Human
70.8
52.7
Actor Performance
73.3
65.3
Objects
76.9
57.8
Animals
73.5
75.8
Text Fidelity
67.7
54.0

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Seedance 2.0 Fast
No reliability results available
Veo 2
122 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Seedance 2.0 FastVeo 2
Technical cleanliness
Not published
64.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
Not published
91.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
Not published
96.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
Not published
52.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
Not published
69.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 Fast leads here by 13.7 points.

Matched Text outputs from Seedance 2.0 Fast and Veo 2
Loading video
Seedance 2.0 Fast
Loading video
Veo 2

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 Fast leads here by 1.6 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Seedance 2.0 Fast and Veo 2
Loading video
Seedance 2.0 Fast
Loading video
Veo 2

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 2.0 Fast leads here by 7.0 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Seedance 2.0 Fast and Veo 2
Loading video
Seedance 2.0 Fast
Loading video
Veo 2

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 2.0 Fast detailsSee full Veo 2 details
CapabilitySeedance 2.0 FastVeo 2
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesNo
Audio inputYesNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 2.0 Fast better than Veo 2?

Seedance 2.0 Fast is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Seedance 2.0 Fast cheaper than Veo 2?

Seedance 2.0 Fast costs less at $7.26 per minute, compared with $21 for Veo 2.

Does Seedance 2.0 Fast generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 2.0 Fast includes audio output.

Does Veo 2 generate audio?

No, Veo 2 does not include audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Veo 2?

Seedance 2.0 Fast supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 8 seconds for Veo 2.

Which model scores higher on 2D Animation, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Veo 2?

Seedance 2.0 Fast scores higher for 2D animation.

Which model scores higher on Anime Animation, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Veo 2?

Seedance 2.0 Fast scores higher for anime.

How are Seedance 2.0 Fast and Veo 2 compared?

Megaton compares each model's latest published scores. The side-by-side videos use the same prompts.

Continue researching

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Veo 2

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 2.0 Fast and Veo 2

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Scores come from each model's latest published evaluation. The side-by-side videos use the same prompts so you can compare the results directly.
File reliability
Automated checks review 122 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 25, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.