Swipe for more top models
Compare
LTX 2 19B vs Veo 3 Fast
Veo 3 Fast edges out LTX-2 19B overall (LTX-2 19B 43.0 vs Veo 3 Fast 48.0.) Veo 3 Fast is the quick draft option for the Veo 3 class. It gets you about 80% of the way there and works well for rapid prototyping and quick social drafts. It has the same strengths as Veo 3 (cinematography, native audio, scene consistency) and the same weaknesses (actor performances, glossy aesthetic, image-to-video). For draft work, Veo 3.1 Fast is the better option in this class. The main tradeoffs are in Actor performances, Logical worldbuilding, Has a glossy aesthetic, Image-to-video tasks, where LTX-2 19B tends to score better.
LTX-2 19BLightricks | Veo 3 FastGoogle |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
Lightricks
lightricks
Lightricks is the platform that serves LTX-2 19B requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
LTX-2 19B and Veo 3 Fast are effectively tied on physics, with small tradeoffs across the metrics. The biggest separation is on Physics (0.2), but it's not decisive overall. In practice, you should decide based on the specific sub-metric you care about most, since neither model consistently dominates this slice of the rubric.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 41.9 | 42.0 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Veo 3 Fast leads on prompt and logic (+6.5), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+23.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 50.0 | 48.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 16.8 | 40.7 |
| Scene Consistency | 52.2 | 50.0 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
LTX-2 19B leads on aesthetics (+2.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+4.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, LTX-2 19B is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 48.7 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Veo 3 Fast leads on animation (+4.6), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+23.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 55.0 | 37.7 |
| 3D Animation | 28.3 | 51.3 |
| Anime Animation | 35.0 | 43.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3 Fast leads on humans (+10.7), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Human (+19.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 33.6 | 53.2 |
| Hands | 34.6 | 44.7 |
| Actor Performance | 54.3 | 56.7 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
LTX-2 19B leads on objects and animals (+1.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+8.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, LTX-2 19B is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 47.6 | 53.9 |
| Animals | 54.6 | 46.0 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3 Fast leads on text (+25.7), with a measurable advantage over LTX-2 19B. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+25.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 19.3 | 45.0 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
LTX-2 19B leads on cost and speed (+200.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+595.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, LTX-2 19B is the safer pick here.
| Metric | LTX-2 19B | Veo 3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.040 | $0.100 |
| Price / min | $0.58 | $6.00 |
| Latency | 0ms | 595ms |