#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0 Pro
#2
KlingKling 3 Pro
#3
KlingKling 2.6
#3
GoogleVeo 3
#5
xaiGrok Imagine 1.0
Compare

Veo 3.1 Fast vs Seedance 2.0 Pro

Seedance 2.0 Pro edges out Veo 3.1 Fast overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 52.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Pro 73.0.) Seedance 2.0 Pro is an incredible model that can produce extremely consistent scenes with incredible actor performances. It can produce complex cinematic scenes in one go. Important caveat: this model produces the most copyrighted content out of any model we've tested—if copyright compliance is important, avoid this one. The main tradeoffs are in Logical inconsistencies in details, Copyright compliance (produces the most copyrighted content of any model), where Veo 3.1 Fast tends to score better.

Google
Google
Veo 3.1 Fast
52
52
Total Score
Veo 3.1 Fast
rank
#11
cost
6.00
/min
speed
638
ms
ByteDance
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 Pro
73
73
Total Score
Seedance 2.0 Pro
rank
#1
cost
12.00
/min
speed
0
ms
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle
Seedance 2.0 ProByteDance
Good for
  • Cost and Speed
Good for
  • Animation
  • Text
  • Prompt and Logic
  • Physics
Bad for
  • Animation
  • Text
  • Prompt and Logic
Bad for
  • Cost and Speed
Modalities
CapabilityVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro
Text input
Image input
Video input
Audio input
Image output
Audio output

Providers

Google
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
ByteDance
Provider
ByteDance
bytedance
ByteDance is the platform that serves Seedance 2.0 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.

Physics

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on physics (+22.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Physics (+22.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt and Logic

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+24.8), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Prompt Adherence (+32.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Aesthetics

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on aesthetics (+15.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+30.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Animation

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on animation (+44.4), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+67.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-painted rotoscope: a ballerina performs fouettés, traced from live reference but stylized with ink outlines and watercolor fills. The motion is realistic but the look is distinctly illustrated.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-drawn puppy 2D cel-shaded animation style: a golden retriever pup with floppy ears chases a butterfly through a meadow, trips over its own paws, rolls, and bounds up joyfully. Watercolor backgrounds, expressive line work, heartwarming motion.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Humans

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on humans (+16.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+29.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Human
Prompt
A woman practices yoga at sunrise on a cliff overlooking the ocean, flowing from warrior pose into a deep lunge. Wind catches her hair.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Objects and Animals

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on objects and animals (+14.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Animals (+22.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Objects
Prompt
Product hero shot: a luxury watch rotates on a pedestal, catching light on every surface. Crystal, brushed steel, leather strap. The branding is legible. Zero geometry drift through the full rotation.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot at a bright outdoor skatepark. A female skater in a red beanie and black hoodie rolls toward camera on a skateboard with a bold checkerboard deck graphic. The camera tracks alongside her smoothly. She performs one clean kickflip and lands it, continuing forward. The beanie, hoodie, and checkerboard graphic remain stable without flicker, and the board does not morph mid-air.”
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Text

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on text (+37.3), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+37.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Text Fidelity
Prompt
Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Animated CGI kid's cartoon style: a playful squirrel leaps between tree branches in a colorful forest, but every other frame is held like a storybook illustration. Bright colors, exaggerated expressions, motion lines, intentionally bouncy yet fluid animation.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro

Cost and Speed

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads on cost and speed (+210.6), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+638.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Seedance 2.0 Pro is the safer pick here.
MetricVeo 3.1 FastSeedance 2.0 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Anime Animation
Prompt
Shonen power-up japanese anime style: a fighter screams as golden aura explodes around him, rocks levitate, the ground cracks. Hair spikes upward, muscles bulge. Speed lines, lens flares, the whole absurd beautiful spectacle.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Blocks are removed one by one by two people, the tower wobbles, tilts and finally collapses, it falls. The removed blocks remain visible nearby.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Actor Performance
Prompt
close up of a man's face as he sits in a world war one trench, he is overwhelmed by emotion before breaking down into tears.
Veo 3.1 Fast
vs
Seedance 2.0 Pro