#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0 Pro
#2
KlingKling 3 Pro
#3
KlingKling 2.6
#3
GoogleVeo 3
#5
xaiGrok Imagine 1.0
Compare

Seedance 2.0 Pro vs Kling 3 Pro

Seedance 2.0 Pro outperforms Kling 3 Pro with an overall score of 73 vs 62, showing particular strength in cinematography, animation, and text rendering. Both models excel at actor performances, but Seedance offers better scene consistency while Kling leads slightly in human realism.

ByteDance
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 Pro
73
73
Total Score
Seedance 2.0 Pro
rank
#1
cost
12.00
/min
speed
0
ms
Kling
Kling
Kling 3 Pro
62
62
Total Score
Kling 3 Pro
rank
#2
cost
0.50
/min
speed
60.0
sec
Seedance 2.0 ProByteDance
Kling 3 ProKling
Good for
  • Text
  • Animation
  • Aesthetics
  • Physics
Good for
Bad for
Bad for
  • Text
  • Animation
  • Aesthetics
Modalities
CapabilitySeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro
Text input
Image input
Video input
Audio input
Image output
Audio output

Providers

ByteDance
Provider
ByteDance
bytedance
ByteDance is the platform that serves Seedance 2.0 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.
Kling
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 3 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.

Physics

Seedance 2.0 Pro scores 68.3 vs Kling 3 Pro's 59.3 on physics simulation. Seedance handles physical interactions more reliably, though both models can produce occasional inconsistencies.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Prompt and Logic

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads in prompt adherence (76.3 vs 63.5), while logic consistency is essentially tied at ~61 for both. Kling may require re-prompting to achieve desired results.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Aesthetics

Seedance 2.0 Pro dominates cinematography with 84.1 vs 63.3, producing notably more cinematic, well-composed shots. Scene consistency also favors Seedance at 73.4 vs 61.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Animation

Seedance 2.0 Pro significantly outperforms across all animation categories: 2D (69.7 vs 47.3), 3D (82.5 vs 60), and anime (78 vs 51.3). Kling's animation capabilities are described as average.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-painted rotoscope: a ballerina performs fouettés, traced from live reference but stylized with ink outlines and watercolor fills. The motion is realistic but the look is distinctly illustrated.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-drawn puppy 2D cel-shaded animation style: a golden retriever pup with floppy ears chases a butterfly through a meadow, trips over its own paws, rolls, and bounds up joyfully. Watercolor backgrounds, expressive line work, heartwarming motion.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Humans

Kling 3 Pro edges ahead in human realism (75.9 vs 69.1), but Seedance leads in hand rendering (82.7 vs 57.8) and actor performance (86 vs 81). Both excel at emotive acting.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Actor Performance
Prompt
close up of a man's face as he sits in a world war one trench, he is overwhelmed by emotion before breaking down into tears.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Objects and Animals

Seedance 2.0 Pro leads in both animals (78 vs 65.8) and objects (63.3 vs 57.9). Kling is noted for standout animal realism despite the lower score.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Animated CGI kid's cartoon style: a playful squirrel leaps between tree branches in a colorful forest, but every other frame is held like a storybook illustration. Bright colors, exaggerated expressions, motion lines, intentionally bouncy yet fluid animation.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Text

Seedance 2.0 Pro significantly outperforms in text fidelity at 85 vs 53.7. Kling's text rendering is described as just okay and may require re-prompting.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Text Fidelity
Prompt
Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Anime Animation
Prompt
Shonen power-up japanese anime style: a fighter screams as golden aura explodes around him, rocks levitate, the ground cracks. Hair spikes upward, muscles bulge. Speed lines, lens flares, the whole absurd beautiful spectacle.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Blocks are removed one by one by two people, the tower wobbles, tilts and finally collapses, it falls. The removed blocks remain visible nearby.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro

Cost and Speed

Seedance 2.0 Pro costs $0.20/second ($12/minute) and supports image input; Kling 3 Pro pricing is unavailable but noted as expensive. Important caveat: Seedance produces the most copyrighted content of any tested model.
MetricSeedance 2.0 ProKling 3 Pro

Prompt Comparisons

Actor Performance
Prompt
a man sits next to a woman at a bar they both sip at their drinks. They both exchange a flirty glance and smile.
Seedance 2.0 Pro
vs
Kling 3 Pro